Digital Nugget #4: CEOs are Blogging! Thursday, Sep 28 2006 

CEO bloggers communicate to the masses

POSTED: 11:16 a.m. EDT, September 18, 2006

var clickExpire = “10/18/2006″;

Adjust font size:

Decrease fontDecrease font

Enlarge fontEnlarge font

SANTA CLARA, California (AP) — Sun Microsystems Inc. CEO Jonathan Schwartz recently became “un blogeur” when he started publishing his Weblog in French and nine other languages.

Schwartz, whose online journal attracts 50,000 viewers each month, says going international will generate new customers attract prospective employees in Europe, China and elsewhere. That puts the 40-year-old chief executive at the vanguard of a trend in corporate communications, one that tears down barriers between executives and consumers.

“The blog has become for me the single most effective vehicle to communicate to all of our constituencies — developers, media, analysts and shareholders,” Schwartz said in an interview in his Silicon Valley office. “When I go out and have dinner with a key analyst on Wall Street or a key investor from Europe and ask them if they’ve read my blog, they almost universally say yes.”

CEOs of smaller companies have already seized on blogs, and big companies are increasingly joining in — despite the potential for disastrous backfires. In its unfiltered form, blogging lets them bypass the public relations department, journalists and industry analysts and speak directly to the public.

Executive coach John Agno said blogs can also cure the dreaded “CEO disease” — the isolation that envelops a leader when subordinates become reluctant to disclose bad news or worst-case scenarios that might trigger a shoot-the-messenger response.

“Blogs are personal — they humanize the Web and keep CEOs in touch with what’s going on out there in America,” said Agno, head of Ann Arbor, Michigan-based consulting company Signature Inc. “People feel they can really have a conversation with someone who has a blog.”

Yet Schwartz is one of only a handful of Fortune 500 CEOs who blog — and his entries are often risque. In his zeal to tout Sun, Schwartz has crossed paths with the company’s legal department, whose attorneys have asked him to include “safe harbor” statements on blog entries that discuss future business strategies and products.

Thirty Fortune 500 companies are now publishing corporate blogs, nearly double the number in December 2005, according to the Fortune 500 Blogging Wiki, a collaborative tracking site. Technology companies like Amazon.com Inc., Cisco Systems Inc. and Oracle Corp. were early adopters, but senior executives at industrial giants like Boeing Co. and General Motors Corp. have also embrace the trend.

The amount of time executives spend blogging depends on the length and frequency of entries, though few seem to update more than once a week. Some executives — including Whole Foods Market CEO John Mackey — don’t include much original content and simply rely on excerpts from public speeches and press releases.

GM Vice Chairman Bob Lutz’s “Fast Lane” blog includes entries from other GM executives and links to his favorite German and French auto enthusiast sites. Lutz’s site has generated 10,000 reader responses since January 2005 and, along with a smaller GM corporate blog, gets 4,000 to 6,000 unique daily visitors.

The blog allows the Swiss-born executive to write directly to hard-core motorheads around the world. More than 900 readers asked Lutz, who oversees product development at world’s largest automaker, to revive the Chevrolet Camaro. GM said last month it would develop a new Camaro based on a concept car unveiled in January.

“I’m not going to tell you that Camaro is happening because the blogosphere demanded it; that would be disingenuous,” Lutz wrote. “But I will tell you that the enthusiasm shown for Camaro in this forum is a shining and prominent example of the passion that exists for this automobile.”

More than 3,000 of Sun’s 30,000 employees maintain blogs on the corporate network. Schwartz says one reason he encourages executives to blog is that it helps Sun attract new employees with specialized interests. Schwartz says the most esoteric blog entries — those discussing chip multithreading; open-source projects in Brazil; or Java, the programming language Sun developed in the early 1990s — attract passionate responses.

“If you really care about Java in the medical device community, the fact that there’s a Sun blog where someone focuses on that suggests there’s someone at Sun you can relate to,” Schwartz said. “There may be three people at Sun who care deeply about this stuff, and you can go hang out with them if you come work for us.”

Karen Christensen, CEO of Great Barrington, Mass.-based Berkshire Publishing Group, usually updates her blog weekly but last week spent a half-hour a day, five days a week, blogging during a visit to China. The blog gives colleagues a sense of her long hours and concern for the details of all her publications. That window into her world makes book reviewers — her harshest critics — consider her work in new light, she says.

“I had a reviewer write to me and say, ‘I never knew there were real people behind this,”‘ Christensen said.

The publishing industry is rife with bloggers, including Macmillan Publishers Ltd. CEO Richard Charkin, whose “Chark Blog” includes slice-of-life entries from the British executive.

Consultants say blogging suits natural-born writers — but it’s tough for other executives.

“Ultimately, a good blog is good writing. Most CEOs are not good writers,” said Debbie Weil, a Washington-based consultant and author of “The Corporate Blogging Book.”

“The packaging and controlling of the corporate message has always been done for them, so often they don’t realize that writing well is hard work and takes time and thought and practice,” said Weil.

Blogs can also become a publicity land mine.

The worst blogs tend to be the newest — before executives gain the confidence and speed to write for the medium, said Weil. She encourages “soft launches” where an executive practices blogging with entries that don’t get published, and urges companies not to publicize the blog for several months after its debut.

Nondisclosure agreements and financial regulations can turn the most literary CEOs into scribes who post rehashed speeches or press releases. CEOs may also lack the thick skin required for blogging, said David Taylor, an executive consultant in Boulder, Colorado.

“One of the inevitabilities of blogging is that you get critical, hostile responses from trolls — people who post provocative things just to inflame a reaction,” Taylor said. “If you’re the CEO of a 5,000-employee company, you don’t need to be dealing with a troll.”

CEO bloggers can also take heat when companies stumble.

Sun’s annual revenue has declined in four of the past five years, and shares have plummeted from a high of about $64 in September of 2000 to around $5 this year.

“As much as I’m impressed by Jonathan’s blog, I wonder how he has time to blog when he has a company that desperately needs management steered in the right direction,” Taylor said.

Schwartz shrugs off criticism, insisting that blogging makes sense at Sun, which develops computer and storage systems, high-speed microprocessors and software for operating network equipment for corporate clients.

“Mainstream communication is horrible at serving niches,” Schwartz said. “This is a good way to take the expertise around Sun, which can be pretty esoteric, and ensure it’s available to the marketplace holistically.”

 My thoughts:  Well, blogging is not only for lowly college students or people who have  major political stance they need to take….it is now being used by CEOs of fortune 500 companies for mass communication with stakeholders.  I think that blogging can be a great tool for CEOs or corporate leaders to use not only to keep people informed, but in order to keep themselves involved with people they may not otherwise communicate with.  Often, those in high positions tend to become isolated from the rest of the organization’s staff or even from clients/customers.  I like how this article points out the “human” feel that blogging has….its like even if you know you will never get that “face-to-face” with “the big guy”, you could read his blog and get a real sense of what his thoughts are that week.  I also think that because blogging is more or less “new” and optional, those CEOs or corporations that are doing it are most likely not going to post a bunch of PR nonsense.  If they are going to take the time to be innovative and creative, they are probably going to blog accordingly.  At the same time, the PR attention would just happen naturally if your clients were reading it, and internally it would generate good relations with employees.  I think top execs of big firms is a win-win situation! 

Digital Nugget #3 Philanthropy Google’s Way: Not the Usual Wednesday, Sep 20 2006 

By KATIE HAFNER

Published: September 14, 2006

SAN FRANCISCO, Sept. 13 — The ambitious founders of Google, the popular search engine company, have set up a philanthropy, giving it seed money of about $1 billion and a mandate to tackle poverty, disease and global warming.

But unlike most charities, this one will be for-profit, allowing it to fund start-up companies, form partnerships with venture capitalists and even lobby Congress. It will also pay taxes.

One of its maiden projects reflects the philanthropy’s nontraditional approach. According to people briefed on the program, the organization, called Google.org, plans to develop an ultra-fuel-efficient plug-in hybrid car engine that runs on ethanol, electricity and gasoline.

The philanthropy is consulting with hybrid-engine scientists and automakers, and has arranged for the purchase of a small fleet of cars with plans to convert the engines so that their gas mileage exceeds 100 miles per gallon. The goal of the project is to reduce dependence on oil while alleviating the effects of global warming.

Google.org is drawing skeptics for both its structure and its ambitions. It is a slingshot compared with the artillery of charities established by older captains of industry. Its financing pales next to the tens of billions that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation will have at its disposal, especially with the coming infusion of some $3 billion a year from Warren E. Buffett, the founder of Berkshire Hathaway.

But Google’s philanthropic work is coming early in the company’s lifetime. Microsoft was 25 years old before Bill Gates set up his foundation, which is a tax-exempt organization and separate from Microsoft.

By choosing for-profit status, Google will have to pay taxes if company shares are sold at a profit — or if corporate earnings are used — to finance Google.org. Any resulting venture that shows a profit will also have to pay taxes. Shareholders may not like the fact that the Google.org tax forms will not be made public, but kept private as part of the tax filings of the parent, Google Inc.

Google’s founders, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, believe for-profit status will greatly increase their philanthropy’s range and flexibility. It could, for example, form a company to sell the converted cars, finance that company in partnership with venture capitalists, and even hire a lobbyist to pressure Congress to pass legislation granting a tax credit to consumers who buy the cars.

The executive director whom Mr. Page and Mr. Brin have hired, Dr. Larry Brilliant, is every bit as iconoclastic as Google’s philanthropic arm. Dr. Brilliant, a 61-year-old physician and public health expert, has studied under a Hindu guru in a monastery at the foothills of the Himalayas and worked as a Silicon Valley entrepreneur.

In one project, which Dr. Brilliant brought with him to the job, Google.org will try to develop a system to detect disease outbreaks early.

Dr. Brilliant likens the traditional structure of corporate foundations to a musician confined to playing only the high register on a piano. “Google.org can play on the entire keyboard,” Dr. Brilliant said in an interview. “It can start companies, build industries, pay consultants, lobby, give money to individuals and make a profit.”

While declining to comment on the car project specifically, Dr. Brilliant said he would hope to see such ventures make a profit. “But if they didn’t, we wouldn’t care,” he said. “We’re not doing it for the profit. And if we didn’t get our capital back, so what? The emphasis is on social returns, not economic returns.”

Development of ultra-high-mileage cars is under way at a number of companies, from Toyota to tiny start-ups. Making an engine that uses E85 — a mixture of 85 percent ethanol and 15 percent gasoline — is not difficult, but the lack of availability of the fuel presents a challenge, said Brett Smith, a senior industry analyst at the Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor, Mich.

Another barrier, Mr. Smith said, lies in the batteries for so-called plug-in hybrids, which require more powerful batteries that charge more quickly than the current generation of hybrid batteries.

There are skeptics, too, among tax lawyers and other pragmatists familiar with the world of philanthropy. They wonder whether Google’s directors might be tempted to take back some of the largess in an economic downturn.

“The money is at the beck and call of the board of directors and shareholders,” said Marcus S. Owens, a tax lawyer in Washington who spent a decade as director of the exempt organizations division of the Internal Revenue Service. “It’s possible the shareholders of Google might someday object, especially if we go into an economic depression and that money is needed to shore up the company.”

And there is the question of how many of the planet’s problems can truly be addressed by a single corporate entity.

But even while expressing reservations about Google’s approach, Mr. Owens said that the structure of Google.org “eliminates all the constraints that might otherwise apply.”

The only conventional part of Google.org is the Google Foundation, a nonprofit with an endowment of $90 million that is constrained in how it spends by the 501(c)(3) section of the Internal Revenue Service code.

 Google’s big philanthropic experiment lies in the part of Google.org where the bulk of the funding now resides. This part of Google.org will be fully taxable, with the ability to invest in a full spectrum of programs and companies.

All of Google.org’s spending, Dr. Brilliant said, will be in keeping with its mission, and there is to be no “blowback.” That is, should Google.org make a profit with one of its ventures, those funds will not go to the search engine business, but will stay within Google.org.

Google had existed for only six years, when, in advance of the company’s initial public offering in August 2004, Mr. Page and Mr. Brin told potential investors that they planned to set aside 1 percent of the company’s stock and an equal percentage of profits for philanthropy. By the end of 2004, Google.org was formed.

The company has said it plans to spend the money over the next 20 years, and the Google board recently approved a more rapid disbursement rate, $175 million over the next two years.

“Poor people can’t wait,” Dr. Brilliant said. “Dying people can’t wait for some 20-year plan. It’s not what we’re doing here.”

Ventures that grow out of Google.org could be seen to have a competitive edge because they do not need to show a financial profit. But financial returns from a project like the high-mileage car are not necessarily the aim.

“I think how you count profit is the issue here,” said Peter Hero, president of the Community Foundation of Silicon Valley, a charitable foundation with about $1 billion in assets. “Google.org is measuring return on cleaner air and quality of life. Their bottom line isn’t just financial. It’s environmental and social.”

Once Google.org was formed, the company spent months searching for an executive director. There was no lack of interest in the job.

“Literally thousands of people worldwide got in touch with us,” said Sheryl Sandberg, the Google vice president who led the search. “We’d get someone who was an amazing technology entrepreneur but who didn’t know anything about the developing world.”

Then along came Dr. Brilliant, an affable man generous with bearhugs and self-deprecating humor whose unlikely résumé looks like a composite career summary of multiple high achievers.

After receiving his medical degree, Dr. Brilliant studied for two years with Neem Karoli Baba, a famous Hindu guru.

As Dr. Brilliant tells the story, in 1973, shortly before the guru’s death, he told Dr. Brilliant to “take off the ashram whites” and use his skills as a physician to help eradicate smallpox, which was devastating India at the time.

Dr. Brilliant joined a team of United Nations workers who painstakingly worked their way through India inoculating people against the disease. In 1980, the World Health Organization declared that smallpox had been eradicated.

In 1978, Dr. Brilliant started the Seva Foundation, which focuses on preventing and curing blindness throughout Asia and Latin America. In 1985, Dr. Brilliant was a co-founder of the Well, a seminal online community. Throughout the 1990’s and early 2000’s, he ran several high-tech companies in Silicon Valley.

Dr. Brilliant first heard about Google.org in early 2005 while lying in bed in India, sick with dysentery. He had gone there to work with the polio eradication program of the United Nations and, while recovering, he saw news of Google.org in a local newspaper.

He sent an inquiry to the only e-mail address he could find: info@google.com. He got no response.

This year, Dr. Brilliant was awarded the TED Prize, an award given at the annual Technology, Entertainment and Design conference, a gathering of leaders from the technology and entertainment industries. The prize awards three recipients $100,000, and a “wish” for how to change world.

Dr. Brilliant’s wish was for the creation of an “early detection, rapid response” system for disease outbreaks. The idea would be an open-source, nongovernmental, public access network for detecting, reporting and responding to pandemics.

Some Google insiders heard about the award and invited Dr. Brilliant to give a talk at the company. Mr. Page and Eric E. Schmidt, Google’s chief executive, were in the audience as Dr. Brilliant described the polio eradication efforts of the United Nations. They agreed they had found their director and began to recruit him.

At first, Dr. Brilliant said, he was thrilled. But then he turned skeptical, largely because of the for-profit structure of the organization.

“I got weak knees,” he said. “It was weird. It was precedent setting.” After several lengthy conversations with executives at Google, Dr. Brilliant changed his mind. Six months into the job, he has traveled to India to visit eye clinics and polio vaccination projects with Mr. Page, and to China to discuss clean energy alternatives. Next week, he leaves for Africa to visit Google grant recipients in Ghana.

Dr. Brilliant said he had no desire to “reinvent the wheel” by working on projects others are already involved in. And although Google is a high-tech company, that does not mean that Google.org will be throwing around high-tech solutions.

“Why would we put Wi-Fi in a place where what they need is food and clean water?” he said.

My thoughts:  Want to know who, locally, is on board with Google’s approach to solving major social problems?  Please visit www.pghaccelerator.org. The Social Innovation Accelerator is an operating foundation, located in Pittsburgh, that agress social innovation and social enterprise will significantly impact the nonprofit, public, and private sectors—in ways that will cause real social change.  I think what Google is doing–their new approach to philanthropy–is proof that the current social system is not working and that something else needs to happen.  Not only does the change have to come from nonprofits, but getting private corporations and governement on board with social enterprise could really make this world a better place to live in.  So why are there so many skeptics? Nonprofits and foundations are used to the traditional ways of approaching social issues and problems, but it is time people realize that not much is changing—if anything things are getting progressively worse.  With the billions of dollard poured into nonrpofits, it is about time that all sectors step up and take the responsibility to make some changes and stop wasting money and resources….lets try something innovative!

Milestone #3: HTML is not only for Myspace! Wednesday, Sep 20 2006 

OK, now that I just typed an entire page of information on HTML’s and when I went to Publish, it erased everything…I am not in a good mood!!!!!!! So to continue what I was saying, I had only heard of HTML twice in my lie…once in an IT undergraduate course at IUP and then more recently with the rise of the Myspace craze.  I have only copied HTML codes from other websites for my myspace page, other than that, I thought I had no use for the coding knowledge.  I mean, unless you design websites for a living, isnt the coding jsut more of a headache than anything else?  Why arent there blank fields that can read regular text…such as “make the back ground on the forst page RED”.  You would think computers are smart enought or advanced enough to handle a normal command, entered in the right field.  Although I must say that te coding isnt terribly confusing (a.k.a <i> means make italic, <b> means make bold), but it can get very involved when you are writing alot of text.  The symbols are possibly the most confusing, but thank goodness in the English language we dont have many accents on letters.   I feel like a hypocrite for talking so badly about HTML because I enjoy the results of the codes so much.  I have an appreciation for beautiful websites, however I wouldnt necessarily want to take the time to create codes to make one.  Ha…funny, thats how so many things in life are….always want the easy route, yet the rewards of working harder at something are much more fulfilling!  Maybe I should keep that in mind next time I change my myspace background, layout, graphics, and colors…..maybe I wont use the pre-written codes and write my own to make my page more unique. Hmmmmm its a possibility, maybe I could use Snyder’s chapter to guide me along the way. I will let you all know if I try…..maybe I could become a pro at it and learn to help develop the website of the next organization I work at….whatever the case may be, I feel smarter for not only what HTML is and what it does, but more so that it is not just for myspace (I can assure you many people probably do). 

Milestone #2: IT: Bringing Better Business to Government Wednesday, Sep 13 2006 

This milestone,  Bringing Better Business to Government, is an analysis of “A Brief History of Public Sector Information Technology Policy”, Chapter 2 in David Garson’s book on e-governance.  I discuss IT implications for security and post 9/11, policy issues, and private sector business strategies that are being applied to public sector agencies.  Please take a minute to read the 5page analysis attached….its an eye-opener!

Nugget #2: Movies for our Ipods!! Wednesday, Sep 13 2006 

SAN FRANCISCO, California (Reuters) — Apple Computer Inc. said Tuesday its iTunes online music store would begin selling movies from Walt Disney Co.’s Disney, Pixar, Touchstone and Miramax divisions as the iconic company makes it most aggressive move yet into the digital home.

At the event Apple also unveiled a number of new iPods, including one with the most capacity to date, and said new versions of the popular digital music players would sport video games such as Pac-Man and Tetris.

Apple Chief Executive Steve Jobs said a new 80 gigabyte iPod would cost $349. The company also introduced a new, thinner iPod Nano available in five colors with 24 hours’ battery life and a 1 gigabyte iPod Shuffle.

Jobs also said the company plans to ship a device in the first quarter 2007 that will allow consumers to stream movies, music, photos, podcasts and television shows to their home entertainment systems. The device, code-named iTV, will cost $299.

Speaking at a event in San Francisco, Jobs said newly-released movies would cost $12.99 if pre-ordered or bought during the first week available. Library titles would cost $9.99, Jobs said at the event, where the company also introduced new versions of its iPod digital music devices. (Watch Jobs announce the new iTunes service — 3:44)

He said there are about 75 films now available for purchase on iTunes and they would take about 30 minutes each to download for those using a high-speed Internet connection.

“In less than one year we’ve grown from offering just five TV shows to offering over 220 TV shows, and we hope to do the same with movies” Jobs said. “iTunes is selling over 1 million videos a week, and we hope to match that with movies in less than a year.”

Jobs is a Disney director and one of the company’s largest individual shareholders.

Analysts have said it was only a matter of time before Apple started selling full-length movie downloads via iTunes. The company already has sold millions of songs on iTunes, as well as television shows.

If Apple’s efforts are ultimately successful, the company could solve the entertainment industry’s current dilemma: how to bridge the gap between the living room television and the computer.

If Apple can fix that, analysts have said they see the potential for another round of robust growth at a time when the company is facing a growing contingent of competitors in the digital music market, including from Microsoft Corp..

There are already some competitors in the online movie download market.

CinemaNow, Movielink and Amazon.com Inc. already offer movies for download to computers and it would not be like Apple simply to sell a competing product by adding full-length feature films to its iTunes store, analysts have said.

 My thoughts:  This makes me very happy!  After spending $300 bucks on my video iPod, I am very excited that I can now put movies on it without borrowing my friend’s encryption software to get DVDs to work.  I can now buy them and download them legally! It was getting really old downloading the same old Desperate Housewives episodes, or watching played out music videos, so being able to have my favorite flicks on hand while being stranded in airports (which happens way too often now a days) is quite exciting.  What will Apple come up with next? Kind of scary to think of the possibilities…..but as long as they remain affordable like they have…then I am all for it!! Go Apple, Go Apple, Its your birthday, ohhhhhh!

Milestone #1: Geek Squad….No More! Thursday, Sep 7 2006 

Taking apart Tom’s laptop today in class was a big milestone for me! I more or less had the attitude of “I don’t care how it works, just as long as it does!”.  I am the first person to run to the “computer guys” on campus or to the GEEK SqUAD at Best Buy when something isn’t working right with my laptop…but now I may think twice! Why pay hundreds of dollars to fix something that could be done yourself? I learned the more familiar you were familiar with the hardware, the more use you will get out of the computer…as well as understand what the machine is actually doing….what parts are working to accomplish your commands.  i never knew where my hardrive was in my laptop, nor did i know where the RAM was. Wow! i just used a techy term…RAM is random access memory….random access means that any item can be retrieved directly (Snyder p.14).  The memory is where a program and data are stored while a program is running…..I saw the RAM in a laptop for the first time, and understand what it is! What a milestone….

Nugget #1: DELL, GOODWILL, & E-RECYCLING Thursday, Sep 7 2006 

PITTSBURGH, Aug. 16 /PRNewswire/ — Goodwill Industries of Pittsburgh and Dell today introduced Reconnect Pittsburgh, a free drop-off program for recycling of unwanted computers by area residents.

The program helps protect the environment through the responsible recycling or reuse of computer equipment, and provides residents a convenient opportunity to support a local charity.

Reconnect Pittsburgh takes advantage of the existing donation and retail infrastructure of Goodwill and the recycling experience and resources of Dell to offer a proactive, community-based solution to environmentally responsible electronics disposal.

The goal of the program is to divert more than two million pounds of used computers and computer equipment from landfills over one year and to provide consumer education on the importance of proper computer disposal, while creating job opportunities for individuals with disabilities and other employment barriers throughout the Pittsburgh region.

Goodwill will accept donated computer equipment from residents at each of its retail stores and donation centers in the Pittsburgh area. Goodwill will consolidate and sort equipment for shipment to a Dell product recovery partner for reuse or recycling. Equipment that meets minimum standards will be refurbished and resold and all proceeds will support its non-profit job training and community programs. Equipment that cannot be refurbished will be responsibly recycled.

Residents will be responsible for removing data from hard drives and other storage media before donating to Goodwill.

This program is part of Dell’s efforts to provide consumers convenient, easy and free recycling. Dell recently announced a policy of recycling all Dell-branded products at no charge.

Other Goodwill-Dell programs are under way in Austin (15 counties in Central Texas), San Francisco (Marin, San Francisco and San Mateo counties), San Antonio (23 counties in Central and South Texas), San Diego County and throughout the state of Michigan.

My thoughts: I never really thought of what happens to computers when they are no longer useable.  Recycling electronics is environmentally critical and I am glad to see that DELL stepped up to the plate and made this effort towards resposible recycling of computers.  I think it is great that they partnered with a local nonprofit (as well as other Goodwills around the country) to get the job done.  More private technology firms should partner with the social sector…..there are so many projects, like this one, that could be implemented.  People are getting job training and employment, Pittsburgh is becoming environmentally conscience, technology is at the forefront of the program, and the support of DELL is making that possible. E-recycling is on the move in Pittsburgh…very progressive! 

« Previous Page

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.